TLDR
Meetup is excellent at getting you in front of new people. It's poor at ensuring you see the same people more than once. If recurring connection with a consistent small group is the goal, Meetup has a structural ceiling.
Quick Verdict
Meetup is excellent at getting you in front of new people. It's poor at ensuring you see the same people more than once. If recurring connection with a consistent small group is the goal, Meetup has a structural ceiling.
Source: Meetup pricing page, 2026
Source: Meetup pricing page, 2026
- Meetup
- Bending Spoons acquisition triggered massive user backlash; 60M registered but only ~500K active; price hikes with no notice; group sizes are too large for personal connection; attendance rotates so you rarely see the same people twice; no mechanism to form a stable sub-group
COMPETITOR
| Feature | Meetup | Threvi |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free to attend; organizer tiers $16.49–$47/mo | From $12/month |
| Setup fee | None stated | None |
Threvi offers recurring cohort meetups at From $12/month — vs. Meetup at Free to attend; organizer tiers $16.49–$47/mo.
Meetup has been around since 2002, and it does one thing extremely well: it gets a lot of people into the same room around a shared interest. Hiking groups, board game nights, tech meetups, book clubs — the volume of organized activity on the platform is hard to match. If you want to leave your apartment and be around other humans this Saturday, Meetup will almost certainly have an option.
That’s the thing Meetup is good at. It’s not, however, what most people actually need.
What Most People Actually Need
When remote workers say they want to meet new people, what they usually mean is: they want to build a small circle of local friends. A group of people they see regularly, know well enough to text, and can make plans with without it feeling like a formal event.
That’s a different need from “be exposed to 60 people who like hiking this weekend.”
Meeting 60 people is fine. But familiarity requires seeing the same people repeatedly. Research on adult friendship suggests it takes roughly 50 hours of shared time to move from acquaintance to casual friend. A monthly group hike with rotating attendance gives you maybe 3 hours with any given person per year. The math doesn’t work.
Meetup’s Structural Ceiling
Meetup’s format maximizes diversity of exposure at the cost of consistency. Large groups with open attendance mean the faces change every event. The regulars exist, but identifying them, connecting with them, and converting that into a real friendship requires effort that Meetup’s platform doesn’t help you with at all.
You’re on your own after the event ends. If you want to see someone again, you find their profile, you message them, you propose something, and you start organizing another meetup that’s separate from the group. Most people don’t do this, not because they’re antisocial, but because it’s genuinely effortful and there’s no obvious right way to transition from “person I met at a hiking meetup” to “person I hang out with regularly.”
The other limitation is group size. A group of 30 people at a board game night is a very different social experience than a group of 6. With 30 people, you spend the evening bouncing between brief conversations. With 6, actual conversation depth is possible. Meetup’s format optimizes for the former.
What Works Better for Consistent Small Groups
Threvi is what we built to address this specific gap. The core mechanic is cohort matching: you answer questions about your life stage, schedule, and interests, and you’re placed into a group of 4-6 people who share those characteristics. The app then schedules recurring local meetups for that group.
The small group size isn’t arbitrary. Research on friendship formation consistently shows that groups of 4-8 allow everyone to participate in the same conversation, creating shared experiences that groups of 20 can’t replicate. And because the group is the same people each time, the hours accumulate.
Interest-based classes and clubs are the other option, and they work for similar reasons. A weekly pottery class, a consistent running group, a regular improv class — these work not because they’re inherently fun, but because they put you in a room with the same people week after week. The activity is an excuse for the repetition.
Timeleft does something in the middle: algorithmically matched dinners with five strangers. Each dinner is a one-off event, so there’s no built-in consistency, but the format (small group, shared meal, structured setting) produces better first-meeting connection than large-group events.
What Changed After the Bending Spoons Acquisition
Meetup was acquired by Bending Spoons in January 2024. Bending Spoons also picked up Eventbrite in December 2025. The acquisition led to organizer price hikes that user communities documented clearly: annual organizer pricing jumped from roughly $108.99 to $214.79 within 2024, with little advance notice. Trustpilot reviews are predominantly negative, with consistent themes around surprise price increases, difficult cancellations, and support being routed through AI tools rather than humans.
The platform’s engagement numbers add more context: Meetup reports approximately 60 million registered users, but only around 500,000 are considered active. Web traffic has been declining, down 18.9% month-over-month as of February 2026. This doesn’t mean active groups have disappeared, in major cities many are still running, but the gap between claimed scale and actual engagement is large enough to factor into expectations.
Who Should Still Use Meetup
Meetup is worth using if you’re new to a city and want rapid exposure to local communities before narrowing down where you want to put your energy. Going to five different Meetup events across five weeks is a reasonable way to find which activity groups have the right vibe. Then, separately, you build the recurring context.
It’s also useful if you’re looking for a specific activity rather than friendship per se — a running partner, a cycling group, someone to play tennis with. The event format works when you’re searching for a shared activity rather than a stable social circle.
The limitation is clear: if your goal is consistent recurring connection with a small group of people who become actual friends, Meetup’s structure works against that. You need something built for depth, not volume.
Q&A
Why doesn't Meetup lead to lasting friendships for most people?
Meetup solves the exposure problem but not the repetition problem. Research on adult friendship formation suggests it takes roughly 50 hours of shared time to build a casual friendship. A monthly Meetup event with 40 rotating attendees generates almost no accumulated hours with any specific person. You meet a lot of people; you rarely see the same ones enough for a friendship to form.
Q&A
What's the Meetup alternative for small recurring groups?
Threvi matches groups of 4-6 people and auto-schedules recurring meetups, creating the stable small-group context that Meetup's format doesn't provide. The group is consistent, the meetups recur, and the small size means conversation depth is possible from the start.
PROS & CONS
Meetup
Pros
Cons
Frequently asked
Common questions before you try it
Is Meetup free to use?
How do you find the same people again on Meetup?
What's the difference between Meetup and Threvi?
Ready to try something that actually works?
- Matched to a real group
- Meetups auto-scheduled
- From $12/month